TechWords Interactive IBM Lotus Notes Crossword

Hey now, here's something crafted especially for Lotus Notes enthusiasts and just posted to my iTWire blog section, A Meaningful Look

It's the third in my new series of interactive technology crosswords for iTWire, and you'll find it at the following link:

TechWords Interactive IBM Lotus Notes Crossword

I really hope that you Lotus followers all like it -- or at least appreciate it -- and if you do please help me by "Digging" it on the above iTWire page.

I'm looking forward to coming back to the theme of IBM and Lotus Software in a while, after creating some puzzlers for other technologies.

I'm aiming to create a new technology crossword (or searchword) puzzle every week or two, but they take quite some fiddling to prepare and upload to iTWire. And keep in mind that's not even making allowance for the creative juices that have to flow in order to devise the clues and answers for each theme. Over the last few weeks I've developed a healthy respect for crossword puzzle authors!

Guidelines for developing Lotus Notes/Domino Internet applications

An Aussie mate of mine, Ethann Castell, has recently published a very nice article that everyone who's involved with Lotus Notes/Domino applications for the Internet should read and heed. You'll find his article here:
Top 10 issues when developing Lotus Notes Domino Internet applications

Ethann's article for some reason triggered a bout of recalling memories about computing hardware and software that I've been involved with.

This is my 39th year in the IT industry (I've been programming for over forty years though). I started with IBM Australia in January 1970, and took an early -- very early -- retirement package offer at the end of February 1992. However, under that early retirement plan it transpired that I didn't need to formally retire from IBM until I reached the 25-year mark in mid 1995, so I managed to qualify as a member of the IBM Quarter Century Club, which is a nice thing (although, along with some other such vintage things at IBM, the QC Club is now a "pale image of its former self").

During my 22+ years active career at IBM, I worked on three or four generations of IBM systems and software platforms. This included the IBM mainframes (System/360, System/370, and later), System/7 (sensor-based, real-time computing, where I spent many months coding low-level assembler language to modify an application suite called PIMS, for the monitoring and control of plastic injection molding machines), IBM mainframe communications (SNA, VTAM, NCP, APPC, the 3741 Communications Controller,etc). Starting in the mid 1970s I got to work with System/3 (from the Rochester Development Lab in Minnesota) and its descendants: System/32, System/34, System/36 ("stick them in a corner and forget about them, they run and run, with minimal IT support") and the RPG programming language (a little weird but extremely effective for running the commercial apps back then, and still so as an enormously-improved language to this day).

In August 1978 I made my first ever Qantas flight across the wide Pacific Ocean to the USA, heading for IBM's Rochester Lab, for an intense two-week briefing on the the system code-named "Pacific" which was released as the IBM System/38. This was one of a two "epiphanies" that I experienced in the commercial IT world (more about the second one a little later). The S/38 was conceived and architected in the earlier 1970s by some brilliant IBMers at Rochester, some of whom had moved there when another leading-edge system architecture project (the FS, or "Future System") was canceled. These architects joined the Rochester L:ab and helped come up with the amazing architecture of the S/38, which later morphed (together with the best features of the highly-popular S/36) into the
Application System/400. In typical IBM product naming fashion, as the AS/400 was improved it was rebranded as "i Series" and currently goes under the moniker "System i". The original outstanding architectural foundations live on in today's models: single-level storage, technology-independent machine interface, object-based architecture, machine-level security implementation, and much more. Oh, if only some of this brilliance could make its way into the stunted PC architecture!

I had a second epiphany when I came across Lotus Notes in early 1993, soon after Release 3 had been announced. I attended a Lotus roadshow event that really opened my eyes: document-oriented architecture, seamless replication of documents across Notes network, and more. Lotus had succeeded in getting working at the PC cost level things that IBM had spent well over a decade in developing for its mainframes and (to a lesser extent) midrange systems, but still hadn't managed to make them all that popular even with its enterprise customers much less the broader constituency. A year or two later IBM took the excellent step of acquiring Lotus, and with IBM's deeper pockets the ongoing development of Notes was assured. Many new features were added in subsequent releases.

For Release 4.1 an experimental Internet capability, called Internotes, was added to the "Lotus Notes Server" and this was seen as such a big deal that, for Release 4.5, the server component was rebranded the "Lotus Domino Server." From then on, when you talk about "Domino" you're essentially referring to the Web-serving capabilities. that is, the terms "Domino apps" and "Web apps" are synonymous.

The term "Notes apps" usually signifies the original rich style of "fat client" applications, which in my opinion to this day are to be preferred since they're usually more functional than Web apps. Yes, of course I can see the side of the argument that talks about the ubiquity of the Web. but any Web application architect/designer will be well aware of the lack of standardization of browsers, the limitations of the architecture for handling applications (issues with handling the browser's "Back" key being just one example), the issues with Web pages that are served out dynamically (via DHTML, or AJAX, or whatever) not being search engine friendly, and a host of other things. Even though it is proprietary, at least the Lotus Notes Client is a single, controlled development target compared with the zoo that is the Web application world!

Well, I've certainly rambled on a bit too far today, eh. I fully understand that Web applications are essential. IBM has been putting much effort into enhancing Lotus Notes and Domino, witness the snazzy Eclipse-based Lotus Notes 8.0 client.

Domino-based Web apps will continue to be developed and deployed for the foreseeable future, therefore again I exhort you to go read Ethann's article for a very nice summary of important considerations.

Steps for installing multiple Lotus Notes Client releases on a single system

(Last updated 08 April, 2008)

PREAMBLE:
So, you're perhaps a developer or a tester or administrator, and are wondering how you go about installing more than one Lotus Notes Client release on your computer.

In October last year (2006) I briefly discussed some tips for installing multiple Notes client releases on a single system with some links to other peoples' posts on this topic.

There was also a related post about the possibility of using Junction Points or SoftGrid for Installing multiple Lotus Notes releases on a single system? but, in retrospect, I don't think that this is a useful path to follow. Indeed, it could be an extremely difficult and messy way to go about installing multiple Notes/Domino releases!

The most "generic" solution is to run multiple virtual machines on the one system, each VM having a different Notes/Domino release. This is, of course, nearest to running them on separate systems, but it doesn't work too well if your system lacks processing power, especially RAM. It's the cleanest solution, in the sense that each Notes/Domino release has its own separate Windows registry to play with (no chance of OLE/ActiveX conflicts).

Since mid-2003 I've been using two different notebook PCs as my main development platforms, but they were not expandable enough in terms of processor power, RAM and hard disk to cope with what I was trying to throw at them. For example, they both happened to be limited to 1GB of RAM. By limiting the separate VMs to no more than about 128 Mb of RAM each, and with the aid of some external USB-attached hard disks, I was able to run three or four virtual machines per notebook. However the performance was a little on the sluggish side, okay for testing purposes but certainly not for continued use.

With the above in mind, over the Christmas/New Year break I've taken delivery of a brand spanking new desktop system: an AMD Athlon X Dual Core 5200+ processor, with 4 GB of RAM and around 1 TB of mirrored hard disk. I pressured hardware specialist Gordon Newell (friend and fellow ex-IBMer) of Chalcot Micro Systems (here in Melbourne, Australia) to build me an ultra-fast yet ultra-quiet desktop machine (it's turned out to be quieter than my latest notebook PC, so I can enjoy listening to quiet music without annoying fan and disk drive noise). Altogether, it should keep me happy for a couple of months, before I notice that it's not fast enough! I'll certainly be running several virtual machines, but it's a pity that the 32-bit Windows XP version cannot make full use of the 4GB of RAM for applications, reporting only about 3.GB as being available. (I would have used the 64-bit version to overcome this issue, however lack of sufficient drivers prevented me from doing so. And this is not to mention the sad and sorry story about having to purchase 64-bit versions of all my applications, but don't get me started on that!)


THE STEP-BY-STEP PROCEDURE:
Here now is a more explicit description than last time about installing multiple releases of Notes/Domino on a single system. Note that this enables you to run each release, but not necessarily concurrently. This is adequate for my purposes but might not be for yours, in which case either follow the VM path or see if Bill Buchan's tips work for you (these are referenced in my earlier post).

The scenario is that I install everything on the Windows G: drive -- which for historical notebook-PC-related reasons happens to be a logical rather than physical drive, though this does not in any way affect the outcome. Change the drive letters to suit your own situation (and, of course, they don't all have to be installed on the same drive).

I'm assuming here that, for development and support purposes, your intent is to install not the simple Notes Client but rather the Domino Designer/Administrator product.

The releases should be installed in the following sequence, meaning that when you're finished the Windows registry should have that latest Notes/Domino settings in effect (in this example, Notes 7.0.2):

1. Notes plus Domino R4.6.4 were both installed into the G:\Notes4 folder (it could have been separate folders, but this works for me, and anyhow I hope that there aren't any of my customers still using R4.6.4).
2. Notes R5.0.11 was installed into the G:\Notes5 folder, and Domino R5.0.11 was installed into the G:\Domino5 folder.
3. Notes R6.5.5 was installed into the G:\Notes6 folder, and Domino R6.5.5 was installed into the G:\Domino6 folder.
4. Notes R7.0.2 was installed into the G:\Notes7 folder, and Domino R7.0.2 was installed into the G:\Domino7 folder.

(Stating the obvious, when you're doing this for yourself you would use your own directory names.)

The release installations go on pretty much uneventfully until you get to the final stage, installing R7 after you have installed R6. The first consideration arises because IBM enhanced R6 to support roaming Notes Client users, see IBM Technote 1106932: Is a Multi-user Installation of Notes/Domino 6.x Needed in Order for Users to Roam?

As a consequence of having taken the multi-user path in an earlier installation, you may need to use the registry tweak described in IBM Technote 1176213: Error: 'You are attempting to upgrade a multi-user installation' when upgrading to a single-user install -- and might find helpful information in Technote 1113003: Unable to upgrade Single-user install to a 6.x Multi-user install plus Technote 1114371: Where is the option for a Multi-user Install of the Notes Client? and perhaps also Technote 1219467: Users are prompted to complete the Client Setup Wizard after upgrading a Notes multi-user installation to 7.0

In my case, I wanted to install Domino Designer/Administrator R7 into the Notes7 folder, but instead was presented with the following installer panel (click on any of the following the images to see an enlargement):



The problem here is that you don't want to install R7 into your R6 folders, but the installer has the Change... buttons grayed out so you are stymied by being prevented from selecting different folders for R7. So what do you do next?

Well, my workaround was to cancel the above R7 installation, start the Windows registry editor (regedit.exe) and locate the hive key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Lotus\Notes whereupon I could see entries for R5 and R6 (but not for R4, which is possibly why you can get away with putting both R4 Domino and R4 Designer into the same folder). I renamed them by adding the string _OLD to their names, like this:


Then, I renamed the Notes6 folder to Notes6_OLD.

Having done that, I relaunched the R7 Domino Designer/Administrator installer and this time was allowed to select the desired new R7 target folders, thus:


When the R7 install was complete, I refreshed the registry editor window and got:


The final step is to rename the R5 and R6 hive key entries back to their proper values (by removing the string _OLD from their names), thus:

And of course, I renamed the Notes6_OLD folder back to Notes6.

After that, all four Notes/Domino releases more or less operated normally.

I run one server and one designer client at a time, and they don't necessarily have to be at the same release level. For example, I might leave the Domino 7.0.2 server running continuously and launch the various Notes Client releases one at a time to perform function compatibility tests.

It's likely that certain Windows registry-based functions such as OLE will only work for the last-installed version, but you can't have everything! (If this is an issue for you, then try the Virtual Machine approach, where you have the older releases each running in its own VM with its own dedicated Windows registry settings.)
--------------------------------------
UPDATE - 05 May 2007:
I just came across IBM Technote 1233184 (modified 2007-01-02) which more or less confirms that my suggested procedure works. The body of this Technote is as follows:

Coexistence of Notes 6.x and 7.x on a single workstation

Problem
IBM Lotus recommends that you do not install more than one version of Notes on the same computer. Notes is not designed to function in this manner. Rather than install, for instance, Notes 6.x and Notes 5.x on the same machine, upgrade your Notes 5.x client to Notes 6.x. If you install both versions on the same machine, be aware that this installation could have adverse effects on the operation of the version of the client (or server) that was originally installed. For example, OLE/COM settings will point to the Notes 7.x directory, default email client settings, etc.

Solution
With that understanding, follow the steps below to install Notes 7.x on a machine that also has 6.x installed:Note: You must have local administrator privileges to complete this procedure. These instructions apply to single user installs only: they do not apply to multi-user client installs.

Shut down the Notes client and all Notes-related tools, utilities and add-ins running on your computer.

Rename the Notes 6.x directory. Notes 6.x is typically installed to \Program Files\Lotus\Notes on Windows. For example, you could rename the directory "Notes6."

Rename the entire Notes registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Lotus\Notes. For
example, you can rename it HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Lotus\Notes6

Rename the entire Installer registry key KEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Lotus\Notes\Installer.
For example, you can rename it
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Lotus\Notes\Installer6

Run the Notes 7.x install program (SETUP.EXE). Select new locations for the program and data
directories. For example, you can select \Program Files\Lotus\Notes7 and \Program Files\Lotus\Notes7\Data

During the install you may see an error message
"Error 1905.Module c:\program files\lotus\notes\nelsons.Dall failed to unregister. RESULT". Click OK and installation will proceed.

When the install program has finished, rename the 6.x directory back to the original directory name, for example, \Program Files\Lotus\Notes)Note: The information provided above is taken from the Notes 7.0 Release Notes.

Related information
Caveats that occur when more than one version of Notes is installed on the same computer

UPDATE - 30 July 2007:
Das Notes Forum has another perspective on this, by Jens b. Augustin:
Parallelinstallation Von Clients, merer Detentions

Here's a translation from German to English (performed by Google Translate):
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fatnotes.de%2Findex.php?topic=15318.0&langpair=de%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8


UPDATE - 22 January 2008:
My website and blog tracking services show that Notes/Domino developers all around the world are very interested in this topic, so here's another promising tip.

I've recently come across another product that appears to have the potential for supporting multiple Lotus Notes Client releases -- or for that matter most other Windows software -- concurrently and robustly. It's called Altiris Software Virtualization Solution (SVS), now a Symantec product. There's a full-fledged professional commercial version and a free personal version (the same as the regular commercial product except for the server-side components for centralized management).The personal version should be good enough for the solo Notes/Domino developer. You can read about SVS at http://www.altiris.com/Products/SoftwareVirtualizationSolution.aspxWhen I get enough time I will read the rather hefty documentation and give SVS a try, then report the results in this blog.

UPDATE - 12 March 2008:
Over at his BizzyBee's Thoughts blog, Martin Vereecken has an article Notes 8 and Notes 7 coexistence that gives another take on the Windows registry settings that I discussed earlier on in this post.

But the most precise recipe so far is this one by Thomas Bahn: Installing and running Notes R5, 6, 7 and 8 concurrently ... Nice work, Thomas!